Hoose v. Prescott Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Ohamplin, O. J.
This is an action upon a policy of insurance.
On May 19, 1888, the Prescott Insurance Company, through Howard W. Sterling, who, at that time, was its agent at Detroit, issued to Margaret Hoose its policy of insurance, covering $1,000 on building corner of Milwaukee avenue and Beaubien street, in Detroit, $1,500 on a stock of groceries, provisions, cigars, etc., contained in said building, and $500 on store furniture, fixtures, counters, shelves, show-cases, and scales; the policy running one year. A fire occurred on March 20, 1889, by which the building was destroyed, together…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. MichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Crossman v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Findlay v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.