Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Continental Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1949No. Docket No. 67, Calendar No. 44,455PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiffs filed a bill of complaint alleging that they had entered into a contract to purchase a house and lot from defendants, the Pollacks; that the house was at that time insured by defendant, the Continental Insurance Company, hereinafter *264called Continental, under a $5,500 insurance policy previously 'issued to Pollacks whom the plaintiffs thereupon reimbursed in the amount of the unearned premium thereon;- that the land contract required plaintiffs, as vendees, to keep said house insured against loss by fire in the name of the vendors and provided that upon plaintiffs’ failure to do so…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kernochan v. . the New-York Bowery Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Cone v. . Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Wingert v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Home Ins. v. KoobCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  5. Traders' Insurance v. PacaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Herpolsheimer v. A. B. Herpolsheimer Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. American Equitable Assurance Co. v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Carlson v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Commercial Union Fire Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. ParvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API