Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Introduction
Following a seven-week trial, on April 22, 2003, a jury found that E*Trade Group Inc. (E*Trade) had breached a mutual nondisclosure agreement it had with Ajaxo Inc. (Ajaxo) by disclosing protected information to Everypath Inc. (Everypath). The jury assessed $1.29 million in damages against E*Trade for breach of the nondisclosure agreement.
In addition, the jury found that Ajaxo was the owner or licensee of a trade secret. The jury found that E*Trade disclosed that trade secret to Everypath without Ajaxo’s consent, and that E*Trade knew or had reason to know that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- WeRide Corp. v. Kun HuangDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Agency Solutions.Com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.