Legal Opinion

Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 2005No. H026757, H027383PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

Introduction

Following a seven-week trial, on April 22, 2003, a jury found that E*Trade Group Inc. (E*Trade) had breached a mutual nondisclosure agreement it had with Ajaxo Inc. (Ajaxo) by disclosing protected information to Everypath Inc. (Everypath). The jury assessed $1.29 million in damages against E*Trade for breach of the nondisclosure agreement.

In addition, the jury found that Ajaxo was the owner or licensee of a trade secret. The jury found that E*Trade disclosed that trade secret to Everypath without Ajaxo’s consent, and that E*Trade knew or had reason to know that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. WeRide Corp. v. Kun HuangDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  5. Agency Solutions.Com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API