Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. Ersoff
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Seth Ersoff appeals from the judgment entered in this action in quantum meruit filed by his former legal counsel, Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. (M&A), to recover attorney fees. Ersoff asserts the trial court committed multiple errors before, during and after trial and contends the jury’s special verdict is not supported by substantial evidence. Ersoff and his trial counsel also challenge an order imposing monetary sanctions against each of them “jointly and severally” in the amount of $3,500. We affirm. 1
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
1. The Infomercial Deal
Ersoff…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Reena Frailich v. Sandra DisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Concepcion v. Amscan Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.