Legal Opinion
Crown Tar and Chemical Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1966No. 8372_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
The management of the Petitioner, Crown Tar and Chemical Works, Inc., had reason to believe and did believe that an effort would be made at an early date to effect a union organization of its employees. For the purpose of thwarting such effort, if possible, the management of Crown determined that it would give its employees a pay increase of fifteen cents an hour. This decision was made in May, 1964. 1 Around the middle of June, Crown’s superintendent, David Hahl, and its bookkeeper were informed that the raise would be made and would take effect the first week in July.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Brown-Dunkin Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by9 opinions
- Betts Baking Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Styletek, Division of Pandel-Bradford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- J. C. Penney Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dothan Eagle, Inc., a Subsidiary of Thomson NewspapersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co., IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.