Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone
Petitioner recognized a labor union as the bargaining representative of its employees. At their request and upon their statement that they were dissatisfied with the union and would abandon it if their wages were increased, petitioner negotiated with them without the intervention óf the union, granted the requested increases in wages and thereafter refused to recognize or bargain with the union. The only questions raised by the petition for certiorari are whether in the circumstances, petitioner’s negotiations with its employees, its payment of increased wages, and its refusal to bargain with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by369 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
364 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.