Legal Opinion

McSweeney v. Equitable Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 20, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Donges, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Atlantic County Circuit, entered in its favor, on motion of the defendant-respondent on the pleadings. Plaintiff moved to strike defendant’s answer, which motion was denied. 16 N. J. Mis. R. 193. Thereupon, defendant moved for judgment, which was granted. The essential facts are not in dispute.

The controversy arises out of the re-organization of the defendant-respondent bank pursuant to the provisions of chapter 116 of Pamph. L. 1933, as amended by chapter 287 of Pamph. L. 1933.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hayward v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Shannahan v. . Empire Engineering Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Joseph v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Basen v. Clinton Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Collins-Doan Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Miele v. McGuireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. State v. ShapiroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  4. White v. AustinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  5. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API