Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Davenport

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 10, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Union District Court. — Hon. H. M. Towner, Judge. Action in equity for an accounting and to recover tlie profits on an interest in a gold mining company, wbicb interest plaintiff claims be owns and bolds, and wbicb defendants insist he forfeited by failing to pay certain assessments levied thereon. From a judgment dismissing the petition and taxing costs to plaintiff, be appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Waterman, J. —

*270 1

2 *269On July 30, 1897, one George W. Hilbo, as trustee, took a lease, containing an option to pur*270chase, of a certain mining claim in the state of Colorado,, from the Jack Pot Mining Company, its then owner.. This lease provided that the lessee should perform a certain amount of work, viz, sinking at least 15 feet. of shaft, or drifting or cross-cutting at least 20 feet, during-each month of the term granted, and that a failure to work the premises for a period of 10 consecutive days should forfeit the rights of the lessee. We are not concerned with any of the other provisions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hayward v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bacon v. ChaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Horr v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Sayre v. Citizens' Gas Light & Heat Co.California Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Warner v. HamillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. McSweeney v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  3. Gray v. BloomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. State Savings Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Lutton v. StengSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API