Legal Opinion
Miele v. McGuire
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 11, 1960PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
31 N.J. 339 (1960)
157 A.2d 306
DANIEL MIELE, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH McGUIRE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 27, 1959.
Decided January 11, 1960.
Mr. Philip J. Mylod argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Mylod & Mylod, attorneys; Mr. James P. Mylod, of counsel).
Mr. Thomas E. Durkin, Jr., argued the cause for the defendants-appellants and cross-respondents (Mr. William J. Gearty, on the brief).
Mr. John Tomasin filed a brief amicus curiae for the Department of New…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Doremus v. Board of Ed. of HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Kelly v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Newark v. PulvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Eckert v. New Jersey State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Loboda v. Township of ClarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- State v. International Federation of Professional & Engineers, Local 195Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Mason v. Civil Service Commission and City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Sporn v. Celebrity, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Pastore v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.