Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Holt

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1991No. B045319PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

A defendant is sentenced for a crime. Imposition of sentence is suspended and he is placed on probation under certain terms and conditions. He is then committed to state prison on another case. Prison authorities notify the defendant’s probation officer of his confinement in state prison. The probation officer fails to notify the court which released defendant on probation of his commitment to state prison within 30 days of receiving this notice.

Here we hold that under section 1203.2a of the Penal Code 1 , the court which placed defendant on probation is deprived of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. RusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. In Re BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. In Re FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re HoddinottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. TambleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. WillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. In Re WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API