In Re Brown
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
The People have appealed from an order, in proceedings instituted by a petition for writ of habeas corpus, which vacated one of the two commitments under which the petitioner was serving concurrent terms, and directed the Adult Authority to exclude the purported sentence thereunder from its consideration. (See In re Cruz (1966) 64 Cal.2d 178, 181-182 [49 Cal.Rptr. 289, 410 P.2d 825]; Neal v. State of California (1960) 55 Cal.2d 11, 21 [9 Cal.Rptr. 607, 357 P.2d 839] [cert. den. 365 U.S. 823 (5 L.Ed.2d 700, 81 S.Ct. 708)]; and In re Cline (1967) 255 Cal.App.2d 115, 118 [63…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re HoddinottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PastetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- People v. DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. RusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. ComoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.