Legal Opinion
In Re Hoddinott
California Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1996No. S045940PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In this cáse we are called upon to interpret Penal Code section 1203.2a 1 , which sets forth sentencing procedures for persons who, while on probation for one offense, are committed to state prison for another offense. Petitioner Robert Hoddinott was on probation for an offense committed in Marin County when he was sentenced to state prison after conviction of an offense committed in San Francisco. Petitioner notified his Marin probation officer in writing of his state prison commitment on the San Francisco offense. The probation officer did not report petitioner’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Doe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Crusader Ins. Co. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Vikco Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ohio Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.