Legal Opinion

People v. Walsh

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1996No. Docket Nos. D024713, D025722PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

Defendant James Carey Walsh appeals a judgment imposing a prison sentence after revocation of probation. Walsh contends the court erred in not making express findings justifying the upper term and in not ordering a supplemental probation report. Walsh also seeks habeas corpus, asserting the government’s failure to comply with statutory time requirements deprived the court of jurisdiction to sentence him. We grant Walsh’s petition for habeas corpus and dismiss his appeal as moot.

I

Introduction

While on probation for assault with a deadly weapon plus two prison priors (Pen.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. McDavidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Lee C.California Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API