Legal Opinion

People v. Tamble

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1992No. B058157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

5 Cal.App.4th 815 (1992)

7 Cal. Rptr.2d 446

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ELIZABETH ANNE TAMBLE, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. B058157.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

April 28, 1992.

COUNSEL

Thomas W. Sneddon, Jr., District Attorney, and Gerald M. Franklin, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Glen Mowrer, Public Defender, and R. Thomas Allen, Deputy Public Defender, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

STONE (S.J.), P.J.

The 1990 amendment of Penal Code section 786 does not require a defendant's waiver of the right of vicinage for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. SakariasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. Gbadebo-SodaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API