Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Flores

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1983No. Crim. 43471PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, contending that the state’s failure to dispose of pending probation violation charges, while he was in federal custody, precluded his incarceration as a probation violator at the conclusion of his federal sentence. We have determined that petitioner is entitled to the relief he seeks, albeit for reasons other than those he asserts.

In December 1975, having previously pled guilty to a charge of possession of narcotics for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351), petitioner was sentenced to state prison. Sentence was suspended and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. People v. BroughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. People v. HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. In Re WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. TimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API