Legal Opinion
Muro v. Target Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 2, 2007No. 04 C 6267PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christine Muro received an unsolicited credit card in the mail. She found this so upsetting that, rather than simply cutting the card in two and discarding it, she filed this lawsuit against Defendants Target Corporation, Target National Bank, and Target Receivables Corporation (collectively, “Target”). Muro alleged that Target had violated two provisions of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. (2000). The first provision prohibits the sending of unsolicited credit card offers (“Count I”), id.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michael B. Smith v. Douglas Lamz and the Village of Algonquin, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cephus Bell v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. BDO Seidman, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Cunningham v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Novelty, Inc. v. Mountain View Marketing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Surgery Center at 900 North Michigan Avenue, LLC v. American Physicians Assurance Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.