Novelty, Inc. v. Mountain View Marketing, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Emergency Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 and This Court’s Inherent Authority (the “Motion for Sanctions”). [Dkt. 165.]1
Background
In November 2007, Novelty filed a Complaint against its competitor, Defendant Mountain View Marketing, Inc., and that company’s parent, McLane Company, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Mountain View” unless otherwise noted). [Dkt. 1.] Novelty alleged that Mountain View was selling knock offs of three Novelty product designs that infringed upon…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Indira ADUSUMILLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Deere v. American Water Works Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
- ANNIE OAKLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. AMAZON.COM, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- Alkima Williamson v. First Horizon BankDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
- Arman Sadeghpour v. Tetsuo Nakamoto, Alexander Falster, and William Simmons, Jr.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.