Legal Opinion
Cephus Bell v. Eastman Kodak Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 25, 2000No. 98-4142PublishedCited by 202 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff filed a Title VII suit in which he claimed among other things that he had been denied a promotion on racial grounds, on the recommendation of his supervisor, Kachenmeister. On March 6, 1998, the district court (Magistrate Judge Pallmeyer) granted summary judgment for the defendant and dismissed the suit. The plaintiff did not appeal but instead, on May 1, 1998, filed a motion to reconsider her decision. In the motion, which we deem a Rule 60(b) motion because filed more than 10 days after the judgment, Helm v. Resolution Trust Corp., 43 F.3d 1163, 1166-67…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- New York Life Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by202 opinions
- Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- David M. Jinks and Elizabeth M. Green v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Nereida Mendez v. Republic BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Marvin D. Gleash, Sr. v. Michael YuswakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Banks v. Chicago Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.