Legal Opinion
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 3, 2015No. Case No.: 5:11-cv-01846-LHK-PSGPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL
(Re: Docket Nos. 3212, 3213)
PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge
Day 1,449 in this case.
*237Following remand by the district judge on two issues arising out of the undersigned’s January 29, 2014 sanctions order, Plaintiff Apple Inc., Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. and non-party Nokia Corporation dispute whether Samsung may withhold as privileged 279 tabbed documents submitted for in camera review. Through a combination of its privilege log, briefs, declarations and this court’s in camera review, Samsung succeeds in showing the documents it…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Chevron Corp. v. Pennzoil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
- (PS) Schmitz v. AsmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Athletics Investment Group, LLC v. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Beckman Coulter, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.