Legal Opinion
Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 29, 2013No. 3:12-cv-00344-RCJ-WGCPublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE BARD’S ASSERTION OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE AS TO FORTY-THREE JOINT SELECTION DOCUMENTS
WILLIAM G. COBB, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this order, the court will undertake a review of the assertion of the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine by Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, “Bard”) as to certain documents generated by Bard, the production of which is sought by Plaintiff Kevin Phillips. Additionally, collateral issues associated with Bard’s document production, including the adequacy of…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Skyline Wesleyan Church v. California Department of Managed Health CareDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Lee v. Chicago Youth CentersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.