Legal Opinion

Access Organics, Inc. v. Hernandez

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 2008No. DA 07-0115PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Access Organics, Inc., sued two of its former employees, Andy Hernandez and Mike Vanderbeek, to enforce non-compete and nondisclosure agreements. The District Court issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting Hernandez or Vanderbeek from competing with Access Organics and from disclosing any trade secrets. The court also issued a preliminary injunction, restraining Hernandez and Vanderbeek from contacting any of Access Organics’s customers. Hernandez appeals, arguing the District Court erred in issuing the preliminary injunction because the non-compete agreement is unenforceable as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Daniels v. Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Langager v. Crazy Creek Products, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Knudson v. McDunnMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Benefis Healthcare v. GREAT FALLS CLINIC, LLP.Montana Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mungas v. Great Falls Clinic, LLPMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. HornerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C. v. Alborn, Uithoven, Riekenberg, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Wrigg v. Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. LUCHT'S CONCRETE PUMPING, INC. v. HornerColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API