Legal Opinion

Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. Horner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 2011No. 09SC627PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

We granted certiorari to determine whether continuing the employment of an existing at-will employee is adequate consideration to support a noncompetition agreement. Petitioner Lucht's Concrete Pumping seeks to enforce a noncompetition agreement signed by respondent Tracy Horner, a former at-will employee. Because Horner was an existing at-will employee when he signed the agreement, Lucht's argues that its forbearance from terminating Horner constitutes adequate consideration for the noncompetition agreement.

The court of appeals held that continued employment does not constitute adequate…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Coors Brewing Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Curtis 1000, Incorporated v. Roy H. Suess and American Business Forms, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Runzheimer International, Ltd. v. David FriedlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Clark v. Green Tree Servicing LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
  3. Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc. v. McQuateDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
  4. England Logistics v. Kelles Transport ServiceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  5. Walshe v. ZaborsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API