LUCHT'S CONCRETE PUMPING, INC. v. Horner
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROMAN.
Plaintiff, Lucht's Conerete Pumping, Inc. (LCP), appeals the trial court's judgments in favor of defendants, Tracy Horner and Everist Materials, LLC (Everist), on claims regarding a noncompete agreement, duty of loyalty, and misappropriation of trade value. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.
I. Background
According to the trial court's findings of fact, LCP is in the conerete pumping business. Concrete pumpers use pumps that are mounted on trucks to deliver ready-mixed concrete to a construction site. Defendant Horner came to work for LCP as…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. HornerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- JW CONST. CO., INC. v. ElliottColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc. v. McQuateDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- DeFranco v. Storage Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Walshe v. ZaborsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.