Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1990No. 88-627PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barz

The District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, Judge Joel G. Roth presiding without a jury, concluded that Daniels, a minority shareholder in T & D Properties, was entitled to $53,128 for his shares in T & D Properties. The District Court based this conclusion on breach of fiduciary duty, oppressive negotiation tactics, constructive fraud, and the presence of a contract between Daniels and Thomas in which Thomas allegedly promised to pay Daniels fair market value for his shares in T & D Properties. The court then granted Daniels his costs in this matter, which included…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Fix v. Fix Material Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bitterroot International Systems, Ltd. v. Western Star Trucks, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Mungas v. Great Falls Clinic, LLPMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Mueller v. ZimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Pro Edge, L.P. v. GueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API