State v. Ferrara
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this case, the defendant, Matthew Ferrara (defendant or Ferrara), appeals from a Superior Court order denying his motion to reduce sentence. Because the defendant has not demonstrated that the trial justice abused his discretion in denying the motion, we affirm. This matter came before the Court for oral argument on January 22, 2003, pursuant to an order that directed the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BallardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- State v. MolliconeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- State v. FurtadoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- State v. FerraraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- State v. D. ORTEGASupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Wall v. KholiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. MendozaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.