Legal Opinion

State v. Mendoza

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 5, 2008No. 2005-308-C.APublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice FLAHERTY,

for the Court.

The defendant, Michael Mendoza, appeals from a Superior Court order denying his posttrial motion to reduce his sentence under Rule 35 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. The parties appeared for oral argument on September 22, 2008, pursuant to an order of this Court to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided without further briefing or argument. After considering the record, the memoranda submitted by the parties, and the oral arguments advanced by each, we are of the opinion that cause has not been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. TiernanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. State v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. State v. BallardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. State v. FurtadoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wall v. KholiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  3. Kholi v. WallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. State v. RuffnerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  5. State v. SnellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API