Legal Opinion
Wall v. Kholi
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 7, 2011No. 09-868PublishedCited by 326 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito
Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), “a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim” tolls the 1-year limitation period for filing a federal habeas petition. 28 U. S. C. § 2244(d)(2). The question in this case is whether a motion to reduce sentence under Rhode Island law tolls the limitation period, thereby rendering respondent Khalil Kholi’s federal habeas petition timely. We hold that the phrase “collateral review” in § 2244(d)(2) means judicial review of a judgment in a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by326 opinions
- United States v. Percy TravillionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Delgros, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- United States v. Corbin ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Hutchinson v. FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
321 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.