State v. Mollicone

OPINION

This case came before the Court for oral argument on January 25, 2000, pursuant to an order directing the parties to show cause why the defendant’s appeal should not be summarily decided. The defendant, Joseph Mollicone, Jr. (defendant), challenges the trial justice’s denial of his motion to reduce sentence pursuant to Rule 35 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. After reviewing the memoran-da submitted by the parties and hearing the oral arguments of counsel, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be summarily…