State v. Morris
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The defendant, Michael Morris (defendant or Morris), appeals from a Superior Court order denying his post-trial motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Rule 35 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because defendant has not shown that the trial justice abused his discretion in denying the motion, we affirm. This ease came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on November 1, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. PinedaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- State v. BallardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- State v. GoncalvesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. MendozaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- State v. VieiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.