Legal Opinion

Vreven v. American Ass'n of Retired Persons

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 25, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1099 (PLF)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter, which stems from defendant’s termination of plaintiff Line Vreven’s employment, is before the Court on plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint, and on defendant’s two motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court heard oral argument on March 18, 2009. After carefully considering the papers filed by the parties, the relevant case law, and the arguments of counsel, the Court grants plaintiffs motion to amend, and grants defendant’s motion to dismiss in part and denies…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Curran v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Sun v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Myers v. Alutiiq International Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Clay v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API