Legal Opinion
United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 25, 2011No. Civil Action 04-0798 (PLF)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
On March 1, 2010, the United States, acting as plaintiff in this civil forfeiture action, moved for judgment on the pleadings against Universal Trading & Investment Company, Inc. (“UTICo”), which claims an interest in the assets named as defendants in the complaint. UTICo quickly moved on March 24, 2010, for leave to file an amended claim and answer, a motion that, if granted, would render moot the plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court heard oral argument on the motion to amend and related matters on May 14, 2010.
After the hearing,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank JuliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.