Legal Opinion
Clay v. Howard University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 28, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1464PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, District Judge
Plaintiff Linda Clay asserts statutory and tort claims against her former employer and supervisor, all related to the end of her employment in the Human Resources department at Howard University. Defendants Howard University and James Jones moved to dismiss Clay’s complaint, and Clay moved orally to amend the complaint at argument on the motions to dismiss on February 11, 2015. In an order (“Order,” ECF No. 21) and accompanying opinion (“Opinion,” ECF No. 20) dated March 11, 2015 the Court granted Plaintiffs oral motion for leave to amend and…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Arias v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Harris v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Copywatch, Inc. v. CrossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Copywatch, Inc. v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Courtney Hamilton v. Julie Campbell, ET AL.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.