Legal Opinion
Curran v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 17, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1559 (PLF)PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, who is pro se, filed suit against various federal and state government officials alleging that they have engaged in systematic harassment and surveillance of her and her family and that they have failed to produce documents responsive to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. The matter is currently before the Court on defendants’ motions to dismiss in whole or in part, plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, and plaintiffs multiple motions to amend her…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Tooley v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Bickford v. Government of the United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States Ex Rel. Digital Healthcare, Inc. v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.