Legal Opinion
McArthur v. Goodwin
California Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1916No. L. A. No. 3779PublishedCited by 21 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
One of the defendants, Will D. Gould, appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The action was one brought by Charlotte L. McArthur to quiet her title to lots one (1), seven (7), ten (10), eleven (11), and thirteen (13) of the Hillard Tract, in the county of Los Angeles. The original defendants were D. M. Goodwin, Will D. Gould, and certain persons sued by fictitious names. The complaint in addition to the usual allegations in such’ suits contained the averment on information and belief that the claim of defendants to an interest in the property was based…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eoff v. IrvineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Cty. Bank of San Luis Obispo v. JackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Cunningham v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Webster v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Silver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Ames v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Kinert v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.