Coonradt v. Hill
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of' the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
—Clear Creek is a natural stream flowing in a southerly direction through the middle of the-east half of section 23 of a certain government township in Butte County.
In August, 1876, the government title to the southwest quarter of the same section vested in John Powers, who, in the fall of that year, completed the diversion of a portion of the water of Clear Creek from its natural channel to said southwest quarter, where the same has been since continuously used by him and his successor, the defendant, Hill, for watering stock, for domestic purposes, and for irrigating their crops and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Farmer v. Ukiah Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Heilbron v. Last Chance Water Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- McNoble v. JustinianoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by15 opinions
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Gartlan v. C. A. Hooper & Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Spargur v. HeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.