Labbe v. American Brass Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The sole question is whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the commissioner’s conclusion denying compensation to the plaintiff. No motion was made to correct the finding of facts made by the commissioner and consequently the court’s contrary conclusion was based wholly upon those facts.
The finding may be summarized as follows: Michaud worked in the defendant’s tube mill located on the westerly side of South Main Street in Waterbury, on the night shift. His hours of employment were from 10:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m. At about 10:10 or 10:15 o’clock on the evening of November 21, 1943, a guard…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Flanagan v. Webster & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Saunders v. New England Collapsible Tube Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rawling v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dombach v. Olkon Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Kolomiets v. Syncor International Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Murchison v. Skinner Precision Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Tinsman Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. SparksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.