Legal Opinion

Murchison v. Skinner Precision Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 4, 1972PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

The plaintiff, the appellant herein, received an award from the workmen’s compensation commissioner from which the defendants, the appellees herein, appealed to the Superior Court. The appeal was sustained and from a judgment rendered thereon the plaintiff has appealed to this court. She has assigned error, claiming that the court erred in failing to review the transcript of all the testimony heard by the commissioner before reaching a conclusion that there was no evidence of repetitive trauma as found by the commissioner; in erroneously applying the law by finding that direct medical…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Saunders v. New England Collapsible Tube Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Atwood v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Triano v. United States Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Jacques v. H. O. Penn MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API