Stakonis v. United Advertising Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
Several of the reasons of appeal relate to desired corrections of the finding, but these have all been waived. The essential facts which appear in the finding and award are that the claimant was one of about fifty employees of the defendant; that it was the custom of the defendant to give an outing or picnic each year to its employees for the purpose of “promoting good feeling among the employees and providing a good time for all who attended.” Not only the employees, but the officers of the defendant attended and took part in the outings. The defendant made all the arrangements and provided…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Mann v. Glastonbury Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Marchiatello v. Lynch Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Moore's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- McNamara v. Town of HamdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Smith v. Seamless Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.