Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1969No. 695SC548PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

By assignment of error No. 1 defendants contend that it was error for the court to allow Police Lieutenant Wilson to testify with reference to not having taken any fingerprints from the pistol without first having found him to be an expert. This contention is without merit and is overruled. See State v. McClain, 4 N.C. App. 265, 166 S.E. 2d 451 (1969). Defendants could not be prejudiced by the lack of evidence against them implicit in the State’s admission that no fingerprints had been taken from the pistol.

Assignments of error Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 6 are concerned with questions pertaining to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. State v. HartsellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API