Legal Opinion

State v. Wall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1968No. 659PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

It is not contended that the witness who appeared before the grand jury was disqualified from giving testimony as a matter of law. Thus, the sole question presented by this appeal is: Did the trial court err in allowing defendant’s motion to quash on the ground that the indictment was returned solely on hearsay evidence?

In the case of State v. Levy, 200 N.C. 586, 158 S.E. 94, the defendant moved to quash the indictment on the ground that the grand jury had returned the indictment as a true bill “upon testimony which was incompetent because based entirely upon hearsay, and that no competent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. . LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. GradyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  5. Harris v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API