Legal Opinion

State v. Stephens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1964No. 650PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The State introduced evidence; defendant did not. Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit made at the close of the State’s case.

The State’s evidence, considered in the light most favorable to it, S. v. Haddock, 254 N.C. 162, 118 S.E. 2d 411, shows the following facts:

About a mile north of the corporate limits of Reidsville, Highway 2552 crosses the tracks of the Southern Railway Company, and about 40 feet in a westerly direction from the railway tracks it intersects Highway 29. This is a grade crossing. At this point the railway tracks run…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. McIverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. State v. . BrackettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. . FoglemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. FoglemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. PainterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. LognerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API