Legal Opinion

State v. Hartsell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1968No. 675PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

The trial court appointed defendant’s trial attorney to appear for him in the Supreme Court. At the expense.of' Guilford County a transcript of the trial was furnished to defendant, and further at the expense of Guilford County the case on appeal and' defendant’s brief on appeal were mimeographed as is done for solvent defendants. ' .

After the .verdict defendant assigns as error, that the “findings of* the Municipal-County Court of Greensboro, purporting to bind de- ‘ fendant over to ■ Superior Court are. not sufficient, and do not show defendant, an indigent, represented by counsel, and do…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hughes v. GaultSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. . LeakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. HerbinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API