State v. Bagley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
I
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in admitting Stowe’s testimony that she had bought heroin from him 75 to 100 times in the past. Evidence of prior crimes is inadmissible to show a defendant’s disposition to commit a crime. State v. Little, 27 N.C. App. 211, 218 S.E. 2d 486 (1975); 4 Strong’s N.C. Index 3d, Criminal Law § 34.1. The general rule is that evidence of another offense is inadmissible even though the other offense is of the same nature as the crime charged. State v. McClain, 240 N.C. 171, 81 S.E. 2d 364 (1954). “Since evidence of other crimes is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . ChoateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . SimonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000