Legal Opinion

State v. Oates

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1983No. 824SC1294PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

We are once again presented with the issue of a prosecutor commenting during final argument upon the defendant’s failure to testify. The private prosecutor asked, as reconstructed for the record by the trial court: “Why in the world did the defendant sit here for these one-and-a-half days remaining mute and not come to the stand?”

The State concedes that the prosecutor’s comment was improper, but argues that the comment was not prejudicial in view of the fact that the court sustained defendant’s objection to the comment and immediately instructed the jury to disregard it. We do…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KemmerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. OakmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API