Munn v. Haynes
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Haynes brought suit in St. Clair county against Thomas and Sarah E. Munn and James J. Boyce as-joint makers of a promissory note which Thomas and Sarah were alleged to have signed as partners under the name of Munn & Co. Service was made on Boyce and Sarah E. Munn on the 24th and 25th of July, 1879, and proof filed July 26th. On. the 26th of July service was made on Thomas Munn in Bay City. Subsequently, on the 10th of' January, 1880, the sheriff of St. Clair who served the declaration in his own county, was allowed to amend his return by dating it July 24, 1879, and stating he could not find…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hartness v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Sheehy v. MandevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Wellover v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Ballou v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Larkin v. ButterfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bagnell Timber Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Post v. ShaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Schmidt v. Agricultural Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- J. A. Fay & Co. v. James Jenks & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Root & McBride Co. v. Walton Salt Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.