Legal Opinion

Sheehy v. Mandeville

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1812PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 U.S. 208

7 Cranch 208

3 L.Ed. 317

SHEEHY

v.

MANDEVILLE.

March 6, 1812

1

Present. All the Judges.

2

ERROR to the Circuit Court for the district of Columbia sitting at Alexandria.

3

This cause having been sent back to the Circuit Court, by the mandate of this Court, at February term 1810, commanding that Court to render judgment for the Plaintiff on his first count and to award a writ of enquiry of damages, upon executing that writ of enquiry the Plaintiff produced the following note.

4

'Alexandria 17th July, 1804.

5

Sixty days after date, I promise to pay to Mr. James Sheehy, or order, six hundred and four…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riddle v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Wilkie v. ChandonWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hickman v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Sheehy v. MandevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1812

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reilly v. PerehinysNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Munn v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Eaton v. TruesdailMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API