Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Agricultural Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1934No. 29,767PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 252 N.W. 671. Action by the plaintiff to recover of the defendants, Agricultural Insurance Company and the National Ben Franklin Fire Insurance Company, upon an agreement to renew a policy of insurance upon a commercial auto truck. At the close of the testimony the action was dismissed by the court as against the National Ben Franklin company. The jury found a verdict for $1,639 against the Agricultural Insurance Company. It appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

1. The complaint alleges that in the latter…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Mallette Ex Rel. Thomas v. British American Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  3. Commercial Fire Insurance v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Rentz v. Live Oak BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  5. Salisbury v. Hekla Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cormican v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Nehring v. BastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Eisenschenk v. Millers' Mutual Insurance Ass'n of IllinoisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Ulledalen v. the United States Fire Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. D. A. Swanstrom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API