Legal Opinion

Root & McBride Co. v. Walton Salt Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1905No. Docket No. 63PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by the Root & McBride Company against the Walton Salt Association, Limited, and the G. N. Skinner Salt Company for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff against the Walton Salt Association, and said defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff sued the Walton Salt Association, Limited, and the G. N. Skinner Salt Company, for the purchase price of $1,800 worth of salt bags. The declaration was the common counts, accompanied by a bill of particulars. The testimony shows an order for bags dated April 22, 1902, signed, “Walton Salt Association, Ltd. Angus Smith,” shipment to be made to the “Walton Salt Association, Ltd.” A second order, dated June 20, 1902, signed G. N. Skinner, directing goods ordered therein to be shipped to G. N. Skinner Salt Company, Detroit, and charged to Walton Salt Association, was also shown.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Durgin v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Munn v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. McPherson v. PinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Codd v. SeitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mally v. Excelsior Wrapper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hillman v. HulettMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Rimmele v. HuebnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API