Legal Opinion

Bagnell Timber Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 17, 1904PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. — Eon. Geo. F. Longcm, Judge. (1) The petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute cause of action. The “Exhibit” is no part of the petition. Kearney v. Woodson, 4 Mo. 114; Had-wen v. .Ins. Co., 13 Mo. 473; Hall v. Harrison, 21 Mo. 227; Chambers v. Carthel, 35 Mo-. 374; Deitz v. Cor-win, 35 Mo. 376; Curry v. Lackey, 35 Mo. 389; Baker v. Berry, 37 Mo. 306; Dyer v. Krayer, 37 Mo. 603; Bowling v. McFarland, 38 Mo.- 465; Kerr v. Ins.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. — Eon. Geo. F. Longcm, Judge. (1) The petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute cause of action. The “Exhibit” is no part of the petition. Kearney v. Woodson, 4 Mo. 114; Had-wen v. .Ins. Co., 13 Mo. 473; Hall v. Harrison, 21 Mo. 227; Chambers v. Carthel, 35 Mo-. 374; Deitz v. Cor-win, 35 Mo. 376; Curry v. Lackey, 35 Mo. 389; Baker v. Berry, 37 Mo. 306; Dyer v. Krayer, 37 Mo. 603; Bowling v. McFarland, 38 Mo.- 465; Kerr v. Ins. Co., 40 Mo. 19; Hickory Co. v. Fugate, 143 Mo. 71. The petition itself does not state either directly, nor by necessary…

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.

This is an action to recover a balance of $5,422.50, and interest, for ties delivered to the defendant at Wagoner Station, Indian Territory, and to establish a lien therefor on the defendant’s railroad in Missouri. The plaintiff recovered a general judgment against the defendant, and was also awarded a lien on the railroad in Missouri, in the circuit court, and the defendant appealed.

The amended petition, upon which the case was tried, alleges that the plaintiff is a Missouri corporation and the defendant a Kansas corporation, doing business in Missouri, and that the other defendants, L. G.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Reed v. BottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Faulkner v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Gamble v. KellumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Chitty v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. Garrison v. Hawkins-Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  2. City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Bagnell Timber Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Hutchinson v. Richmond Safety Gate Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. Laumeier v. DolphMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API