J. A. Fay & Co. v. James Jenks & Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The plaintiff commenced suit against the above-named defendants and the James Jenks & Co. corporation, and declared against them jointly upon the common counts in assumpsit, serving with the declaration a notice that on the trial they would give in evidence under the money counts one certain promissory note, a copy of which is as follows, namely:
“113,000.00. Detroit, October 19, 1886.
“On or before two years after date James Jenks & Co., incorporated, promise to pay J. A. Fay & Co. twelve thousand dollars, at its office in Cincinnati, Ohio; said maker having the privilege of paying any sum at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Munn v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Post v. ShaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Anderson v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Moynahan v. HanafordMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Badour v. ZifkinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- McKinley v. SmallMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Shelfer v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Strohschein v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1909